Ecoriticism

Ecocriticism

Ecocriticism has emerged as a vital lens in contemporary literary analysis, offering sophisticated frameworks for examining how the physical environment is represented and engaged with within literary texts and their broader cultural milieus. It moves beyond viewing nature as mere setting, compelling an exploration of the environment as a complex, interacting system and "nature" as a culturally constructed concept. Its intellectual lineage is firmly rooted in environmental awareness and literary study, extending foundational work by broadening the analytical focus from predominantly wilderness or pastoral narratives to encompass the entire spectrum of environmental engagement, including crucial considerations of urban ecologies, environmental justice, and the diverse experiences of various cultures with their environments. Indeed, Ecocriticism is understood as an interdisciplinary field, focusing not just on traditional nature writing but on the construction of environmental understanding and interaction in all forms of cultural expression.

The relevance of Ecocriticism lies profoundly in its capacity to illuminate the intricate workings of human-environment relationships, power, and representation within literature. It interrogates how cultural narratives encode and perpetuate attitudes towards the environment, seeking to unravel how literary texts both shape and reflect societal norms concerning human dominion over nature, ecological responsibility, and an array of environmental ethics. This critical approach acknowledges that literature, as a powerful cultural product, does not merely reflect pre-existing environmental conditions but actively participates in their creation, reinforcement, or critique. By closely examining textual evidence, Ecocriticism seeks to understand how notions of place, wilderness, environmental justice, and the interconnectedness of human and nonhuman worlds are articulated, challenged, and transformed within literary works and, by extension, within society itself. It encourages a critical awareness of how environmental perspectives influence authorship, readership, and the very fabric of narrative.

At its core, Ecocriticism rests on several key principles. It asserts that the environment is not simply a backdrop but an active force and that "nature" itself is a concept whose meanings are culturally constructed and vary across time and societies. It analyses how literature can both uphold anthropocentric views – systems where human interests are privileged above all else – and disrupt them by promoting ecocentric perspectives. Furthermore, Ecocriticism explores the intersectionality of environmental concerns with other identity markers such as race, class, and gender, recognising that experiences of the environment and exposure to environmental risks are not universal but are shaped by multiple social factors. This approach enables a nuanced understanding of how literary texts engage with, and contribute to, the ongoing cultural conversation about humanity's place in the ecosystem.

Key Concepts in Ecocriticism

Several pivotal concepts and methodologies are central to understanding Ecocriticism:

Nature as a Cultural Construct vs. The Physical Environment: A foundational concept is the distinction between the physical environment (the material world around us) and "Nature" (the socially and culturally constructed ideas, values, and representations of that environment). Ecocriticism posits that while the physical environment has material realities, the meanings and expectations attached to terms like 'wild', 'natural', or 'scenic' are learned and vary across cultures and historical periods.
Anthropocentrism and Ecocentrism: This addresses the human-centred versus environment-centred perspectives. Anthropocentrism views humans as central and superior to nature, often valuing the nonhuman world only for its utility to humans. Ecocriticism often challenges this, advocating for ecocentric views that recognise the intrinsic value of all parts of the environment and the interconnectedness of living systems.
Representation of Environment and Place: Critics analyse how different environments (e.g., wilderness, rural landscapes, urban settings, specific ecosystems) are portrayed in literature. This includes examining stereotypes (e.g., the idyllic pastoral, the threatening wilderness), the valuing or devaluing of certain landscapes, and instances where texts offer more complex or critical representations of human-environment interactions and the concept of "place" as humanly meaningful space.
Pastoral and Wilderness: Ecocriticism explores the diverse and often culturally specific ways the pastoral (idealised rural life) and wilderness (untamed nature) are constructed and represented. This includes analysing 'wilderness' as both a cherished ideal and a problematic concept that can erase human history, and the pastoral as both a celebration of nature and a potentially simplistic or obscuring mode.
Environmental Justice: Originating from social movements, this concept examines the inequitable distribution of environmental benefits (like clean air and water, green spaces) and burdens (like pollution, toxic waste sites, climate change impacts). Environmental justice ecocriticism analyses how literature portrays these disparities, particularly how marginalised communities (often based on race, class, or indigeneity) are disproportionately affected by environmental degradation and lack of access to environmental amenities.
Ecofeminism: Drawing connections between the domination of nature and the domination of women (and other marginalised groups), this concept suggests that patriarchal structures and ideologies underpin environmental exploitation by devaluing both nature and the feminine. Ecofeminist critics examine how literature reflects, reinforces, or challenges these interconnected oppressions.
Place Attachment and Bioregionalism: These concepts explore the deep connections individuals and communities form with specific environments ("place") and the idea that human societies should align with the ecological realities of their "bioregions" (areas defined by natural characteristics rather than political boundaries). Ecocriticism looks at how literature expresses sense of place, belonging, and local ecological knowledge.

Applying Ecocriticism to Nikkei Diaspora Literature

Applying Ecocriticism to Nikkei diaspora literature offers a rich framework for exploring how these texts articulate and negotiate experiences of the environment within the specific historical, cultural, and social contexts of migration, displacement, and community formation. Nikkei literature frequently grapples with themes of identity, belonging, memory, and cultural hybridity, all of which are profoundly inflected by experiences of various physical environments.

Consider, for example, the analysis of Nikkei literature through an Ecocritical lens:

Constructing and Contesting Environmental Relationships in Diasporic Contexts: Ecocriticism can illuminate how traditional Japanese environmental aesthetics or values are transported, maintained, challenged, or transformed within Nikkei communities across different host nations (e.g., the Americas, Brazil, Peru, Canada). It can explore how literary texts depict the pressures on Issei, Nisei, and subsequent generations to adapt to or resist particular ways of interacting with new and often vastly different ecosystems, both in their ethnic communities and the wider society. For instance, narratives might explore the unique environmental challenges and opportunities faced by Nikkei farmers or fishers, or the renegotiation of connections to nature in urban diasporic settings.
Intersection of Environment, Race, and Historical Trauma: Works addressing the trauma of wartime incarceration, such as Joy Kogawa’s Obasan or Miné Okubo's Citizen 13660, can be analysed for how specific environments shape the experience and memory of such events. How did the often harsh and desolate landscapes of internment camps impact Nikkei individuals and communities environmentally, physically, and psychologically? Ecocriticism, combined with an understanding of racialisation and environmental justice, allows for a nuanced reading of how characters navigate multiple layers of marginalisation within these imposed environments.
Representation of Nikkei Environmental Experiences: Literary texts provide a space to examine the diversity of Nikkei engagements with various environments, from agricultural lands to urban centres. Criticism can explore how authors challenge stereotypical portrayals of "nature" or give voice to experiences that deviate from dominant environmental narratives. This could include examining portrayals of Nikkei individuals developing new ecological knowledge in response to new lands, or characters who find solace or suffering in particular landscapes.
Environmental Narratives of Migration and Belonging: The experience of migration and the search for belonging are often profoundly shaped by environmental factors. Ecocriticism can unpack how characters navigate the challenges of adapting to new climates, landscapes, and resource availabilities, and how these factors influence the formation of hybrid identities and communities. It can ask whose stories of environmental adaptation are told, whose are silenced, and how "place" influences the articulation of 'home' and 'community' in the diaspora.
Voicing Marginalised Environmental Realities: Nikkei diaspora literature can act as a crucial site for voicing environmental experiences that might otherwise be overlooked by mainstream environmental discourse or historical accounts. Ecocriticism can help to amplify these voices, examining how literary forms are used to articulate intimate, personal, and often challenging environmental realities within the diaspora. For example, it can explore themes of environmental racism (as seen in internment), struggles over land and resources, the environmental dimensions of labour (e.g., in agriculture or fishing), or the quest for sustainable living in new contexts.

Through such methods, Ecocriticism reveals Nikkei diaspora literature not merely as containing descriptions of environments but as an active participant in shaping, challenging, and expanding our understanding of human-environment relationships within the complex matrix of diaspora.

Advantages and Limitations of Ecocritical Inquiry

Ecocritical inquiry offers significant advantages for analysing literature, particularly for texts emerging from diasporic and marginalised communities like the Nikkei diaspora, where environmental experience intersects profoundly with race, class, and history. Its primary strength lies in its capacity to unveil and critique human-environment dynamics that shape literary texts and the contexts of their production and reception. By focusing on how environments are represented, lived in, and contested, this approach brings to the fore perspectives—particularly those of communities impacted by environmental injustice or engaged in unique forms of environmental adaptation—that have historically been less visible in literary canons and critical discourse. It fosters a more inclusive and just understanding of literature by challenging anthropocentric assumptions and highlighting the diversity of human and nonhuman experience. Furthermore, Ecocriticism’s attention to the cultural construction of "nature" and the material realities of environments provides a powerful tool for understanding how literature both reflects and shapes environmental consciousness, making it invaluable for analysing texts that grapple with place attachment and environmental change in diverse social settings. Its ability to intersect with other critical theories, such as postcolonial or critical race studies, allows for rich, multi-layered analyses.

However, Ecocriticism also faces certain limitations and criticisms. A potential pitfall is that an exclusive or overly zealous focus on environmental themes can sometimes lead to reductive readings, where other significant literary aspects (such as aesthetic qualities, formal innovation, or broader philosophical themes) are downplayed or interpreted solely through an environmental lens. If not applied with nuance, some critiques suggest it can risk imposing contemporary environmental theories anachronistically onto historical texts, or may be perceived as primarily interested in identifying environmental degradation, potentially overlooking moments of resilience or more complex negotiations of human-environment relationships. There is also the concern that certain strands of ecocriticism might inadvertently romanticise or essentialise "nature" or present an overly simplistic view of environmental problems, even while aiming to deconstruct such notions. Moreover, like any critical theory, its application can sometimes become formulaic if not approached with fresh critical thought and careful attention to the specificities of the text and its context. A self-aware and balanced application is therefore essential to harness its considerable strengths effectively.

Conclusion

Ecocriticism provides an essential and illuminating framework for analysing literature, compelling a critical examination of the ways environments are constructed, represented, and negotiated within texts and their surrounding cultures. It moves literary interpretation beyond surface readings of setting to explore the intricate and often deeply embedded ways in which literature interacts with environmental realities, ideologies, and the societal norms that shape human-environment relationships. By interrogating how meanings related to diverse environments and ecological concepts are produced, circulated, and contested, Ecocriticism highlights the crucial role literature plays in both reflecting and actively shaping our understanding of what it means to inhabit the planet.

Its application to Nikkei diaspora literature facilitates a profound engagement with how themes of migration, historical trauma, memory, identity, and cultural hybridity are inextricably linked to varied environmental experiences. By placing these literary narratives under an environment-sensitive lens, and considering their dialogue with specific historical and material conditions, this critical approach helps to uncover the particular ways in which different landscapes and ecological interactions have shaped the experiences, struggles, and triumphs of Japanese individuals and communities outside Japan. It encourages a critical understanding of how these works engage with dominant environmental discourses, challenge unsustainable practices or environmental injustices, and articulate unique perspectives on belonging, displacement, and place-making, thereby giving richer voice to complex and often marginalised environmental narratives within the diaspora. While mindful of its methodological considerations, Ecocritical inquiry offers indispensable tools for appreciating the multifaceted social, political, and personal significance of literary production in relation to the environments we inhabit and imagine.

This foundational work of first-wave ecocriticism explores how literary texts, particularly American nature writing in the tradition of Henry David Thoreau, reflect, shape, and influence environmental values and perceptions. Buell proposes criteria for identifying an "environmental text," emphasising the presence of the nonhuman environment as more than mere framing, the recognition of nonhuman interests, and an acknowledgement of human accountability to the environment. The book was instrumental in shaping early ecocritical thought by examining literature's role in forming cultural understandings of the natural world.

Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin, 1962. (Later editions, e.g., Penguin Classics, 2000, are also widely available).

While not a work of literary criticism itself, Silent Spring is a seminal text that galvanised the modern environmental movement and indirectly spurred the development of ecocriticism. Carson’s meticulously researched and powerfully articulated exposé of the devastating ecological effects of pesticides, particularly DDT, awakened public consciousness to the profound ways human actions were damaging the natural world. Its cultural impact created a climate conducive to the questioning of human-nature relationships that ecocriticism explores.

Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. Routledge, 2004. (Later editions, e.g., 3rd ed., Taylor & Francis, 2023, exist).

Garrard's accessible and influential book provides a comprehensive overview of key ecocritical concepts such as pastoral, wilderness, apocalypse, animals, and Indigeneity, responding to the field's increasing diversity. The work is noted for advocating a "multi-partial" reading approach, judging texts for their articulations rather than solely for omissions. Later editions address contemporary concerns like climate change and environmental justice, reflecting the evolving nature of the field.

Glotfelty, Cheryll, and Harold Fromm, editors. The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. U of Georgia P, 1996.

This collection is widely recognised as a foundational text that helped to define the scope and methodologies of ecocriticism, particularly during its emergence as a distinct academic field in the 1990s. Glotfelty's introduction provided one of the earliest and most frequently cited definitions of ecocriticism as "the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment," advocating for an "Earth-centered approach to literary studies". The reader compiled key essays that established ecocriticism as a legitimate area of literary inquiry.

Heise, Ursula K. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Oxford UP, 2008.

Heise's work makes significant contributions by bringing a global and transnational perspective to ecocriticism. Sense of Place and Sense of Planet specifically explores the challenge of imagining environmental issues, such as biodiversity loss and climate change, on a global scale, often contrasting this with traditional environmentalism's emphasis on local place. Heise introduces the concept of "eco-cosmopolitanism" to articulate a form of environmental awareness that encompasses planetary interconnectedness.

Meeker, Joseph W. The Comedy of Survival: Studies in Literary Ecology. 1972. (Later editions, e.g., U of Arizona P, 1997, exist).

Prefiguring many ecocritical concerns, Meeker's The Comedy of Survival links literature and ecology by examining comedy and tragedy not merely as dramatic genres but as adaptive behaviours in the natural world. Meeker argues that the comic mode, which often emphasises adaptation, continuity, and community, promotes survival by fostering a harmonious relationship with nature, while the tragic mode, with its focus on individual heroism and ideals that often set humans apart from or against nature, can be ecologically detrimental.

Rueckert, William H. "Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism." Iowa Review, vol. 9, no. 1, 1978, pp. 71-86.

This essay is credited with coining the term "ecocriticism". Rueckert proposed the application of ecological concepts to the study of literature, marking an early formal attempt to bridge literary studies with ecological understanding. His work laid some of the initial groundwork for the development of ecocriticism as a field focused on exploring the connections between human culture and the physical environment.

Literary Criticism

Page updated